Skip to content

Robotic surgery

How it works, where it is used, advantages and risks.

Dr. Petronio Melo, urologistCRM-SP 157.598 · RQE 70.275
Reviewed by Dr. Petronio Melo on November 7, 2026
Book a consultation
Dr. Petronio Melo seated at the da Vinci Xi robot console, with his face at the viewer and his hands on the controls
On this page

Quick answer

In robotic surgery, the surgeon controls delicate instruments from a console, with a magnified three-dimensional view. The robot does not operate on its own. In urology, it is used in operations on the prostate, kidney, bladder and ureter. The benefits vary from one operation to another and depend on the surgeon's experience. I have performed more than 1,500 robotic and laparoscopic surgeries, more than 500 of them robotic.

How it works

Before going to the console, the surgeon docks the robot's arms to the patient. The surgeon then sits at the console, in the same room, and controls those arms. The camera and the instruments enter through small incisions.

The features most often cited are the three-dimensional view, the magnified image, the instruments that bend like a wrist and the tremor filter.1

Arms of the surgical robot, covered by sterile drapes, over the surgical field
The robot's arms, covered by sterile drapes, during an operation.
Two abdomens: in open surgery, one larger incision below the navel; in robotic surgery, several small incisions for the camera and the instruments
Example from prostatectomy. The number and position of the incisions vary with the operation.
Real footage: the camera view inside the surgeon's console.

Where it is used in urology

OperationWhat it is for
Radical prostatectomyProstate cancer
Simple prostatectomyEnlarged prostate, in selected cases
Partial nephrectomyKidney tumor, preserving the organ
CystectomyBladder cancer
NephroureterectomyTumor of the renal pelvis and ureter7
PyeloplastyNarrowing between the kidney and the ureter8

What the research shows

Results vary with the operation.

  • Prostate. Comparing the robotic and open approaches, the Cochrane review found little or no difference in urinary and sexual quality of life, with limited evidence.2 A randomized study showed similar urinary and sexual function at 24 months.3
  • Kidney. In partial nephrectomy, one review found less bleeding, fewer complications and a shorter hospital stay with the robotic approach, with a longer operating time.5
  • Bladder. In cystectomy, 90-day complications, margins, quality of life and survival were similar to the open approach, with less bleeding and a longer operating time.6
  • Ureter. In nephroureterectomy, the review found less bleeding and a shorter hospital stay, with low-quality evidence.7
  • Where the kidney meets the ureter. At one center, robotic pyeloplasty succeeded in 90.6% of cases, similar to laparoscopic surgery, with a shorter stay and a longer operating time.8

In cystectomy, the European guideline considers the surgeon's experience and the volume of the center the main factors, ahead of the technique.6

Risks

Robotic surgery has the risks of any surgery, such as bleeding, infection, injury to nearby organs and problems with anesthesia. It may also need to be converted to another approach during the operation.

Single port

In the single-port technique, all the instruments enter through one opening. In a 2025 review, it had less pain and a shorter hospital stay than traditional robotic surgery, with similar results in prostatectomy.4 In partial nephrectomy, the kidney's blood supply was clamped for longer. The review included no randomized studies.4

Length of hospital stay

In selected series, some robotic urologic operations had same-day discharge, in a paper with no comparison group.9 The real length of stay depends on the operation and on each patient.

How I approach it

In my practice, I assess the case and explain the options, with or without the robot. I have performed more than 1,500 robotic and laparoscopic surgeries, more than 500 of them robotic. The decision is made together with the patient, and the family takes part if the patient wishes.

When to see a urologist

  • If you have been told you need urologic surgery and want to know the options
  • If you have been diagnosed with prostate, kidney or bladder cancer
  • If you want a second opinion on the surgical approach

Frequently asked questions

Does the robot operate on its own?

No. Every movement is controlled by the surgeon, who stays at the console throughout the operation.

Is robotic surgery better than open surgery?

It depends on the operation. In prostatectomy, a randomized study showed urinary and sexual function similar to open surgery at 24 months.3 In kidney and bladder surgery, the robotic approach had less bleeding and a longer operating time.5,6 In cystectomy, the surgeon's experience and the volume of the center count for more than the technique.6

Which urologic operations can be done with a robot?

Radical and simple prostatectomy, partial and radical nephrectomy, cystectomy, nephroureterectomy and pyeloplasty, among others. The indication depends on each case.5,6,7

Does robotic surgery have risks?

Yes. It has the risks of any surgery, such as bleeding, infection and injury to nearby organs, and it may need to be converted to another approach during the operation.

What is single-port robotic surgery?

It is surgery with all the instruments passing through a single opening. In a 2025 review, it had less pain and a shorter hospital stay than traditional robotic surgery, with no randomized studies.4

References

  1. Cozzi G, Lorenzis ED, Palumbo C, et al. Robotic prostatectomy: an update on functional and oncologic outcomes. Ecancermedicalscience. 2013;7:355. PubMed
  2. Ilic D, Evans SM, Allan CA, et al. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;9(9):CD009625. PubMed
  3. Coughlin GD, Yaxley JW, Chambers SK, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(8):1051-1060. PubMed
  4. Ficarra V, Romito I, Sorce G, et al. Comparison of Single- and Multiport Robot-assisted Approaches in Prostate and Renal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2025;88(6):589-613. PubMed
  5. Tsai SH, Tseng PT, Sherer BA, et al. Open versus robotic partial nephrectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis of contemporary studies. Int J Med Robot. 2019;15(1):e1963. PubMed
  6. EAU Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer. European Association of Urology; 2026. Disease management chapter. EAU
  7. Veccia A, Antonelli A, Francavilla S, et al. Robotic versus other nephroureterectomy techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 87,000 cases. World J Urol. 2020;38(4):845-852. PubMed
  8. Carmona O, Dotan ZA, Haifler M, et al. Laparoscopic Versus Robot-Assisted Pyeloplasty in Adults-A Single-Center Experience. J Pers Med. 2022;12(10):1586. PubMed
  9. Orsini A, Lasorsa F, Bignante G, et al. Outpatient Robotic Urological Surgery: An Evidence-based Analysis. Eur Urol Focus. 2025;11(2):337-346. PubMed

Would you like to talk about your case?

In the consultation, I go over your tests and your priorities.

Book a consultation

Related guides